The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on Wednesday released an interim proposal that would expand the agency’s definition of a swap to include contracts that pay out based on the outcome of sports events, elections, cultural moments and weather. At the same time, the rule would expressly exclude casino‑style wagers, drawing a clear line between regulated prediction markets and traditional gambling.
Rule expands swap definition
The proposed rule defines an “event contract” as a financial instrument whose payoff is contingent on the occurrence of a specified event. Under the new language, contracts tied to the outcome of a football game, a presidential election, a movie box‑office result or a temperature reading would be treated as swaps, subject to the CFTC’s registration, reporting and margin‑requirements. By contrast, the agency would keep “casino‑style” bets – including typical sportsbook wagers and games of chance – outside the swap definition.
"Event contracts tied to sports, politics, culture and weather will be treated as swaps, while casino‑style wagers will not," the CFTC said in the filing, as reported by Bloomberg.
The move follows a series of appellate rulings that affirmed the CFTC’s jurisdiction over certain prediction‑market products. The agency argues that many of these contracts function as derivatives, allowing participants to hedge or speculate on future outcomes, and therefore fit within the existing swaps framework.
Industry and state reactions
Prediction‑market operators have mobilised quickly. Kalshi, a Chicago‑based platform that currently operates under a CFTC no‑action letter, announced a $3 million lobbying effort to shape the rule and protect its business model. The firm and other industry groups warn that the added compliance burden – including mandatory registration, real‑time reporting and potential clearing‑house obligations – could raise costs and limit the accessibility of these markets for retail traders, many of whom are active in the broader crypto ecosystem.

State regulators, however, see the proposal as an encroachment on their gambling authority. Nevada officials have warned that a federal reclassification could jeopardise the state’s gaming tax revenues, which amount to tens of millions of dollars annually. The NFL has already asked the Supreme Court to review a related case, contending that certain sports‑prediction platforms are effectively gambling operations that should be subject to state licensing.
Election‑betting activity has surged as the 2024 midterms approach, prompting lawmakers in several states to consider stricter controls. The Business Journals noted a spike in betting on congressional races, raising questions about whether states have the power to curb such activity without federal coordination.
Analysts say the proposal could also ripple into the crypto‑derivatives space. Many decentralized platforms allow users to wager on real‑world events using digital assets; reclassifying those contracts as swaps would bring them under U.S. securities and commodities law, potentially forcing compliance with KYC/AML regimes and exposing developers to enforcement actions.

The CFTC has opened a 30‑day comment period on the interim rule, after which a final rule could be issued. Stakeholders are expected to submit feedback on the scope of the definition, the exemption for casino‑style bets and the practical implications for market participants. The agency says the proposal aims to provide regulatory certainty while preserving legitimate hedging and speculative activity.
Market Snapshot
| Asset | Price | 24h | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| $82,989 | +0.49% | $1667.8B | |
| $2,504 | +0.74% | $305.8B | |
| $749.39 | +1.33% | $99.8B | |
| $1.4 | +1.38% | $88.6B | |
| $109.94 | +0.38% | $64.7B | |
| $0.0861 | +1.80% | $13.5B | |
| $0.254 | +6.98% | $9.5B |
Live data: CoinGecko — 2026-10-10 17:22 UTC