Prague, September 10 (Reuters) – A court in the Czech Republic has stripped parliamentary immunity from Dominik Feri, a member of the Chamber of Deputies, after the lawmaker was charged with rape. The decision clears the way for prosecutors to pursue the case without the procedural shield normally afforded to sitting MPs.
The court revoked the parliamentary immunity of MP Dominik Feri, who is accused of rape.
Legal framework
Under the Czech Constitution, members of the Chamber of Deputies enjoy immunity that protects them from criminal prosecution while in office, unless the legislative body consents to its suspension. The process typically involves a request from the public prosecutor, a review by a parliamentary committee, and a final vote by the full chamber. In Feri's case, the judiciary intervened directly, issuing a ruling that nullified his protection and transferred jurisdiction back to the criminal courts.
Legal experts note that the court's move does not constitute a judgment on the merits of the accusation; rather, it removes the procedural barrier that previously prevented the case from advancing. The ruling is consistent with precedents in which Czech courts have acted when there is sufficient evidence to justify a trial, even for high‑profile public officials.
Political fallout
Dominik Feri, who was elected in the 2021 parliamentary elections, is among the younger generation of Czech legislators who have attracted significant media attention. While the specific party affiliation was not detailed in the reporting, his status as a sitting MP has made the case a focal point for public debate on the balance between political privilege and the rule of law.
Opposition parties and civil‑society groups have welcomed the court's decision, arguing that no individual should be above the law. Conversely, some of Feri's supporters have called for a thorough and impartial investigation, emphasizing the principle of presumed innocence until proven guilty.
The revocation of immunity may have immediate consequences for Feri's parliamentary activities, including potential suspension from committee work and restrictions on his ability to travel. It also opens the door for a possible trial, which could extend into the coming months depending on the pace of the investigation and judicial scheduling.
Observers suggest that the case could influence future discussions about the scope of parliamentary immunity in the Czech Republic, prompting legislators to reconsider the balance between protecting democratic functions and ensuring accountability. The outcome of the criminal proceedings, whichever way they unfold, will likely serve as a reference point for any legislative reforms on the issue.
