# Slovak Prosecutor General Challenges Constitutionality of Proposed Justice Reforms

*News · World Desk · Published 2026-11-09T14:46:40Z*

Canonical: https://amk.news/article/slovak-prosecutor-general-challenges-constitutionality-of-proposed-justice-refor

> Slovakia's Prosecutor General Maroš Žilinka has issued a formal warning against proposed legislative changes regarding cooperating witnesses. He argues that the drafted amendments lack clarity and conflict with constitutional protections.

## Key points

- Slovakia's Prosecutor General Maroš Žilinka has officially warned members of parliament that the proposed amendment concerning cooperating witnesses is potentially unconstitutional.
- Slovak Prosecutor General Maroš Žilinka contends that the legislative proposal regarding cooperating witnesses is unintelligible and exceeds established constitutional boundaries.
- Slovak Prosecutor General Maroš Žilinka informed the legislative body that the bill is drafted in a manner that creates significant legal ambiguity.

## Why is the Prosecutor General opposing the reform?

Slovakia's Prosecutor General Maroš Žilinka has officially warned members of parliament that the proposed amendment concerning 'kajúcnici'—or cooperating witnesses—is fundamentally flawed and potentially unconstitutional. According to reporting from the Slovak outlet Topky, Žilinka contends that the legislative proposal is unintelligible and exceeds the legal boundaries established by the Slovak Constitution. The Prosecutor General’s intervention highlights growing internal friction regarding how the state manages testimony from individuals who provide evidence against criminal organizations in exchange for leniency.

## What are the primary criticisms of the amendment?

The primary criticism leveled by the Prosecutor General centers on the lack of legal clarity and the structural integrity of the proposed changes. Maroš Žilinka has informed the legislative body that the bill is drafted in a manner that creates significant ambiguity, which he argues makes the implementation of these rules legally unstable. By claiming the bill crosses constitutional lines, the Prosecutor General is signaling that the current legislative draft could undermine the rule of law if enacted in its existing form.

_Slovakian Parliament building Narodna Rada (8405333681) (Image: Wikimedia Commons)_

> The proposed amendment regarding cooperating witnesses is characterized as fundamentally unintelligible and a direct transgression of constitutional boundaries.
In the broader context of Slovak politics, this clash represents a significant hurdle for the government’s efforts to overhaul the judicial system. The status of cooperating witnesses has long been a contentious issue in Slovakia, often at the heart of high-profile corruption trials. The Prosecutor General, as the head of the public prosecution service, plays a critical role in overseeing these procedures, and his formal warning serves as a significant hurdle for lawmakers aiming to fast-track these justice reforms.

_2014 The Slovak Parliament - panoramio (Image: Wikimedia Commons)_

## What is the political context of this situation?

Slovakia remains in a period of intense legislative debate regarding its criminal justice procedures, with the government and oversight bodies currently at odds. The office of the Prosecutor General holds substantial authority in interpreting how national laws apply to criminal investigations, and Maroš Žilinka has frequently positioned himself as a guardian of procedural regularity. For international observers, this development underscores the volatility of the current Slovak judicial landscape, where reform efforts are increasingly met with resistance from established legal authorities who claim that the integrity of the judicial process is being compromised by hasty legislative actions.

---
Source: AMK News (https://amk.news). Reuse requires attribution and a link to the canonical URL.